23 Sep
2016
23 Sep
'16
11:58 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Edward Diener
I really object to your characterization of "how broken the Boost review process has become". ... Niall's opinion about your library is his own. Don't push that opinion on other Boost developers who may feel differently.
Yup, and my apologies for misreading the situation. When I first announced Beast, there were months of radio silence. But the great support and advice that I've received in this thread has been very helpful.
We don't reject such a library if we find it useful as a low-level library.
This is great news! Have you had a chance to give Beast a try? As I recall, you participated in last year's review of Boost.Http. Thanks