27 May
2004
27 May
'04
4:53 p.m.
David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
Darryl Green <darryl.green <at> unitab.com.au> writes:
Maybe I'm just being thick, but the whole idea of a failing exit action
seems
rather odd to me. This has nothing to do with whether the exit action is a destructor or not. The state is trying to take a transition, it basically has done so, the transition action has run
If exit actions happen after transition actions...
They don't. In any transition all exit actions are executed first, then the transition action and finally all entry actions. Regards, Andreas