Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector

Adam Wulkiewicz wrote:

Why stick to this container? Why close this funcionality inside? You are all of the time debating about one case which should be handled differently.

I don't think that "potential number of elements not bounded by a compile-time constant" can be reasonably classified as "one use case", although you could legitimately argue that it should be handled differently. That is, that people are holding it wrong. I kind of sense that you're a bit frustrated at my holding it wrong. I also predict that many others will hold it wrong. This could be their own fault, or it could be a design issue.