Re: [boost] Alternative implementation for BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_SIZE

Edward Diener <eldiener <at> tropicsoft.com> writes:

the page. My comment is:

"#define AMACRO(x) () IS_EMPTY(AMACRO) is true, where of course it should be false.

Are you sure? My gcc (cygwin) says it false. On the other hand if you define it like this: #define AMACRO(x,y) anything here if fails to build. In any case, as I said previous, this is corner case we should just document, but size should return zero when we actually did not pass any arguments to the macro. Gennadiy