24 Nov
2008
24 Nov
'08
4:20 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Thorsten Ottosen
The library changed after its original form, and into something much better. And the change was motivated by real user feedback, something which the original review in some sense could not provide as much of.
This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as stable/experimental? No library can be stable before it has met its first real users. New libraries are marked as experimental in at least one Boost release. This ought to be OK, since the Boost release cycle is so short nowadays. The release must be commonly available first though. /$