31 Jul
2009
31 Jul
'09
11:41 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Mathias Gaunard<mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
I'm overloaded. If you'd like to submit a patch, that would be great.
I wouldn't mind contributing, but I don't have access to all compilers (17 I believe) to test which ones support or don't support the features (albeit I suppose that the automatic testing on the trunk would eventually give the answer).
Is defining BOOST_NO_* in all compilers for which I don't know whether they support it good enough?
Yes! I'd suggest you test with at least one compiler that supports the feature and one that doesn't. But in general just default to BOOST_NO_*. --Beman