6 Apr
2011
6 Apr
'11
4:43 p.m.
On 4/6/2011 2:14 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you will see "special"& "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/libs/smart_ptr/smarttests.htm
All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
IMO that means the results are meaningless.
Here's another one here comparing shared_ptr<>, intrusive_ptr<> and garbage collected algorithms: http://hnxgc.harnixworld.com/benchmarks/GCBench/ -Phil