Re: [boost] namespace naming -- the question to moderators

Tobias Schwinger wrote:

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:

...

This kind of unnamed namespace can be handled correctly by both MS compilers, with respect to pch, but I don't believe it satisfies the Boost naming convention. OTOH, if no other solution is found, this is the only way we can achieve typeof compliance with pch, while still staying in the unnamed namespace.

Thoughts?

MPL introduces a namespace called "::mpl_" (note: root namespace) by

FYI: IIRC, there was a recent post where explicit leading "::" in refering to namespaces caused problems in atleast one compiler. I don't remember the exact problem, but I think it was a version of borland. Jeff Flinn