Hello Robert, RR> Since these are in different namespaces, can this not be just RR> ignored? Is it worth spending any time on? RR> RR> Robert Ramey Maybe I have something missed, but in my boost sources both aligned_storages are in the same namespace. And indeed I had to remove the new one in order to my code with boost::variant could be compiled. Revisions of aligned_storage.hpp files that I have are: boost/aligned_storage.hpp 1.8 boost/type_traits/aligned_storage.hpp 1.2 RR> RR> JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote: RR>
With the recent addition of TR1 aligned_storage to Boost.TT, there's a nasty collision with a class named exactly the same and living in boost/aligned_storage.hpp (this class is a spin-off from Boost.Variant, IIRC.) I think this has been discussed some months ago, but with no resolution to the best of my knowledge. Apart from the symbol clash, these two classes do not provide the same functionality, so I guess it'd be sensible to rename the older aligned_storage to something else. Ideas?
JoaquМn M LСpez MuЯoz TelefСnica, InvstigaciСn y Desarrollo _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost RR> _______________________________________________ RR> Unsubscribe & other changes: RR> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Vyacheslav E. Andrejev System Architect, Excelsior, LLC