24 Oct
2007
24 Oct
'07
7:37 p.m.
Eric Niebler wrote:
Why not call boost_range_begin from range_begin?
Not a bad idea ... but this doesn't address the problem of the changed meaning of the boost::range_iterator<> metafunction. (E.g., in your scheme, what is the return type of range_begin()?)
Right. There is no workaround for that name swapping. :-( BTW, I think you added a workaround for msvc-7.1 array into Boost.Foreach. That part is no longer needed. You can remove it, waiting for Boost.Range tests to pass. Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame