Thank you, I didn't realize it was already a part of the latest boost library. What I'm curious about is two things... 1) When would I choose unique_ptr<> over auto_ptr<> ? And 2) When would I choose unique_ptr<> over scoped_ptr<> ? Can somebody please provide some coding differences? If these coding examples are already documented someplace, can you please direct me to them? Thank you very much in advance. -Sid Sacek -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of OvermindDL1 Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 6:01 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] unique_ptr, was: Composing non copyable and movable classes On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Sid Sacek <heavyreign@optonline.net> wrote:
I tried to locate the mentioned unique_ptr<> classes for testing, but am
unable to locate them.
Can somebody point me in the right direction please?
This is the only unique_ptr I know of: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/doc/html/interprocess/interprocess_smar t_ptr.html#interprocess.interprocess_smart_ptr.unique_ptr _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost