Re: [boost] Re: call_traits

David Abrahams wrote:

Howard Hinnant <hinnant@twcny.rr.com> writes:

...

As I recall, call_traits was intended to work around the "reference to reference" problem for both parameters and return types. This problem has since been solved by cwg #106 ( http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#106 ).

Or by boost::add_reference ;-)

Out of interest, when did call_traits came into existence? Was it prior to type_traits? When was it reviewed? It seems that we are re-reviewing call_traits again? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net