8 Jul
2012
8 Jul
'12
8:36 p.m.
Hello Jürgen,
Hi Oliver,
On Thursday, 5. July 2012 20:00:48 Oliver Kowalke wrote:
The syntax could be transformed into NASM syntax but the problem is that each assembler has its own syntax and I beleive it is likly that I'm faced to requests to support assembler 'xyz' on platform 'abc' too. Yes, I can understand where this might lead to. Another reason I remember is that MASM allows to specify the exception handler and MASM does the required operations for the Win64-ExeptionHandling (pseudo-operations to create .pdata and .xdata etc.). I believe with gcc I would have to do all this stuff be myself.
regards, Oliver