----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan Gallagher" <ryan.gallagher@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Boost::Format add-on
Joel Falcou <joel.falcou <at> u-psud.fr> writes:
Who is in charge of Format maintenance ?
Sorry, but I don't know. Just some comments on what's proposed. Also, you might post a patch to trac. It's too bad boost doesn't have something like reviewboard setup for proposed patches. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
I would like to propose a simple patch to add an accessor to the number of arguments expected by the formating :
int args() const { return num_args_; }
I'm not a fan of this name and think that more should be done. For the method name, I think "num_expected_args" would be better. Further, "num_bound_args" and "num_remaining_args" may be nice to have.
Finally, I'd like to see better documentation on the already existing "size" method. It's somewhat buried in the html documentation and the header docs are not as clear as they should be.
Hi, you might post a patch to trac ;-) Vicente