Andrey Semashev wrote:
I think, one significant reason for such a situation is that the delay between such a query of interest (and submitting the library review) and the actual review is quite big. For example, the recently reviewed Boost.FSM was in the queue for more than a year, IIRC. Although there were reasons for the delay in this particular case, it's not a sole example - many libraries don't even have review managers for months/years. So when the review happens, many potential reviewers that were excited about the library while the interest poll, now either are gone or found/developed another solution for their needs.
I have no concrete suggestion for improvement on this,
Maybe Boost should have a review Stack instead of a review Queue. :)