
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:19:45 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote:
Surely there is a lot of room for improvement (as illustrated by http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost.Testing), but the above sounds like you think they are in flux, and if so, you should list the particular issues that led you to this conclusion, or otherwise it's FUD. For instance, surely you could check 1.33.1 report pages before making the claim that dynamic_bitset wasn't tested with CW 8.3 (or any other toolset)?
Yes. The "particular issues which led me to this conclusion" are listed in the initial post of this thread. Surely you could read a little above before making the claim that anyone spreads FUD, especially when it comes to people who is being here for years. That said, I don't think I've much more to add to this thread. -- [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]