18 Oct
2021
18 Oct
'21
1:12 p.m.
Glen Fernandes wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:47 AM Andrey Semashev wrote:
On 10/18/21 4:22 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote: Writing more string_view types is not the answer for the reasons I wrote earlier. At some point you will have a problem of interoperability between those types, only more of them.
(Or tell your users to switch to C++23 I suppose.)
I'm not sure what C++23 has to do with this.
C++23 could get http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p1989r2.pdf
cppreference shows it as C++23 https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string_view/basic_string_view so maybe it already got voted in? I haven't kept track.