14 Sep
2004
14 Sep
'04
8:32 p.m.
Carlo Wood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:12:57AM +0000, Tommy wrote:
I'm confused regarding the use of the terms multiplexor and demultiplexor. I hope you mean demultiplexor when you say multiplexor - right?
This is what I assumed, but he has a point here. You (Aaron) propose a class basic_multiplexor, shouldn't that be basic_demultiplexor?
Yes. However, the difference between a demultiplexor and multiplexor is not entirely obvious to me in this context. (We could invent one, if it were valuable, but I don't think it is). I just like short names. :) Aaron W. LaFramboise