17 Mar
2011
17 Mar
'11
9:40 a.m.
Yes. So the behavior of vc10's decltype wrt this issue is in conformance with /current/ working paper -- which is broken, according to n3233. It will be discussed soon in Madrid. If the proposed wording is accepted (and I hope to god it is), then VC10's decltype --along with everybody else's-- will need to be fixed.
But please fix it anyway. :-)
Eric, is it still your opinion that enabling decltype for vc-10 in Boost.Config will break too much for it to be worth it? Thanks, John.