1 Apr
2011
1 Apr
'11
2:20 a.m.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:02:43 -0700, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:53:02 -0500, Andrew Sutton wrote:
I will say that our design does take a slightly more object-oriented approach (g.size(), for example), but that hardly precludes adaptation. Adaptors would have to be written as classes, but that shouldn't be a big deal.
I think you underestimate the cost of adaptation-via-wrapper and urge you to stick with free functions unless you have a really good reason to do otherwise.
Can you elaborate? Thanks, Mostafa