Why use bind here at all? How about just... template<class Archive> struct save_visitor : boost::static_visitor<>{ save_visitor(Archive& ar) : m_ar(&ar) { } template<class T> void operator()(T const & value) const { (*m_ar) << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(value); } private: Archive* m_ar; }; template<class Archive,BOOST_VARIANT_ENUM_PARAMS(typename T)> void save(Archive & ar,boost::variant<BOOST_VARIANT_ENUM_PARAMS(T)> const & v,unsigned int version) { int which = v.which(); ar << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(which); apply_visitor(variant::save_visitor(ar),v); } Regards, Richard.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey Sent: 10 February 2005 05:27 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Re: Release 1.33 [serialization] [variant]-non-intrusiveversion
So, to summarize,
On my machine the results for test_variant are:
fail borland 5.51 fail borland 5.64 fail msvc 6 fail VC 8.0
pass VC 7.1 pass gcc 3.3
I'm sure these are issues with other libraries and older compilers rather than the serialization of variant itself. See if you can convince the respective authors to help you on this.
Robert Ramey
Here is the message for msvc:
test_variant.cpp Linking to lib file: libboost_serialization-vc6-mt-gd-1_32.lib C:\BoostMainCVS\boost/serialization/variant.hpp(118) : error C2780: 'class boost::_bi::bind_t<R,class boost::_mfi::dm<R,T>,class boost::_bi::list1<class boost::_bi::value<R> > > __cdecl boost::bind(R T::*,A1)' : expects 2 arguments - 3 provided C:\BoostMainCVS\boost/bind.hpp(1501) : see declaration of 'bind'