16 Feb
2005
16 Feb
'05
2:50 p.m.
Thorsten Ottosen ha escrito:
|If you plan to extend the lib as outlined in the "future work" section |to cope with pointer-like objects like shared_ptr (an maybe iterators?) |then indirect_xxx would fit better, though ptr_xxx is evocative enough. |Just my 2 cents, anyway.
The first release will not consider the extension with shared_ptr. If people really want it, we should consider it for a second release.
what do you mean by "and maybe iterators"?
I mean, maybe your lib can support in the future indirection through external iterators --in this case, ownership won't be managed by your container as is the case now. Useful for implementing view-like containers. Get my point? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo