"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote in message news:drrm1b$50q$1@sea.gmane.org...
I think it seriously confuses the whole business. When I started, I almost tripped at the first hurdle because I didn't know what I wanted. I fear others won't have been sold by your excellent 'Today I'm going to start testing as I write, flossing my teeth ..." article.
There is also additional confusion with minimal test. Is it now looking so simple that we don't need that (documented) either?
I personally agree with you. Minimal facility is more light weight. Some people value this. Lets hear from the community.
FWIW I would like to use Minimal Test but unfortunately it doesnt define BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE so I wound up faking all the test macros I needed myself. I had to do something because Bjam wouldnt build anything boost using DJGPP gcc on Windows, so I couldnt build test for that compiler, easily at least. regards Andy Little