"Ian McCulloch" <ianmcc@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote in message news:eg5cj6$es7$1@sea.gmane.org...
Andy Little wrote:
"Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:efub9t$sio$1@sea.gmane.org...
"Tom Brinkman" <reportbase@gmail.com> wrote in message news:30f04db60610022214t6b2b42b8h8c4efe9f14bac849@mail.gmail.com... With the last finishing touches completed, i'm excited to be able to announce that the review of Generic Image Library (GIL) will begin October 5, in three days.
Are the GIL Authors interested interested in defending their library against my criticisms or do they expect it to get into boost by default?
If it does get in to Boost without any defence whatsoever, then it will confirm some suspicions (I currently think are unfounded) I have about Boost.
Well, are you going to provide a review?
If the authors cant be bothered to answer my original post... probably not. Why make the effort? So far you have only given
your "first impression".
Yep... what is the significance of the quotes? Or do you think a first impression should be
enough to kill it?
I think it had better start justifying its existence as a proposed addition to boost. regards Andy Little