9 Jun
2006
9 Jun
'06
11:06 a.m.
Darren O'Driscoll wrote:
However my post was more aimed at suggestions for possible improvements to the Boost.Random library. I notice I didn't really get a responce on this. Is that because it was all unteresting stuff / stuff which has been gone over in detail previously, or is that library now closed to changes / unsupported?
Improvements are always welcome, I suggest you try contacting Jens Mauer directly, but in any case you could package up your additions and submit them as an extension to an existing library. John.