On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:11 PM, John Maddock <boost.regex@virgin.net> wrote:
2) If you have to add a config flag, please match the CXX11 naming scheme and call it something like BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR
+1 for that name.
I really don't want to change naming schemes this far into it. If we go down that road, we should also rename the 28 Macros that don't use that scheme.
Are you suggesting we should just byte the bullet and change them all?
Yes, I am. I suggest that we do the same thing that I did for 1.50 and all the BOOST_NO_0X_* macros. Define new ones, make the old ones have the same value as the new ones, and then, down the road, kill off the old ones. See trunk/boost/config/suffix.hpp. I even think that renaming all the macros (while keeping the old names around; not necessarily changing client code) is worth doing for 1.51. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki