28 Feb
2006
28 Feb
'06
4:55 p.m.
On 2/27/06, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
named_shared_memory named_mapped_file named_heap_memory etc. Some users have suggested more descriptive names:
objects_in_shared_memory objects_in_mapped_file objects_in_heap_memory objects_in_user_memory I don't exactly understand where plural form cames from. Isn't, for example, current named_shared_object references _single_ shared memory block?
Yes, but you create named/anonymous "objects" or "instances" of classes using construct<> functions. That's why they have proposed "objects". Best, Ion