On 3/4/2015 3:04 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
On 03/04/2015 03:17 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
I've been looking at another thread which address the problems of maintaining and/or finding a maintainer for MPL. I've come up with an idea for a proposal which I've laid out here: Library Idea MPL lite or MPL2 http://rrsd.com/blincubator.com/bi_suggestion/mpl-lite-or-mpl2/
I think that building an MPL replacement without sequences would be an exercise in futility. The bulk of my MPL usage is handling MPL sequences.
Agreed. Also, I don't think the world needs a drop-in replacement for the MPL. The language has changed and so has our thinking. It least, it's not clear to me that iterators make sense in a metaprogramming environment. -- Eric Niebler Boost.org http://www.boost.org