Vladimir Prus 写道:
Richard Smith wrote:
Richard Smith wrote:
I've just found what I believe to be a new regression on the boost RC_1_34_0 branch relative to the 1.33.1 release. The example below is a simplified extract of some real world where the behaviour of boost::none silently changes. [...]
The attached patch includes a Steven Watanabe's proposed reimplementation of boost::none and a test case demonstrating the regression from 1.33.1. (1.33.1 passes this test case.)
I know that it's late in the day for fixes on the 1.34 branch, but this is silent change in behaviour in a fairly straightforward usage of a commonly used boost library. I really do think it needs to be fixed before 1.34 can be released.
I disagree. There's no way we can release anything this century if we keep on checking in things are branch is frozen. The time window for commits is over at this point. If this patch breaks one of release compilers, we'll spend another week just to get back to zero regressions. We have spent another week, and the patch was just submitted.
The final decision is up to Thomas, of course, but I hope that no code changes will be allowed, no matter what.
- Volodya
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost