[boost] Re: Rationale for library name convention [Was: Dot in Boost Library Names?]

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:

His question was analogous to asking why we don't write david::abrahams.

I hope it is obvious that it wasn't. There are many differences between the name of the human David Abrahams and the name of a C++ library that happens to reside in a certain namespace. But really, I hope we agree that the bicycle shed has been discussed more than enough already. Regards, Andreas