On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
I was faced with either implementing some of the additional clone/pull/checkout/update code with dulwich or likely implement even more for libgit2. Hence I'm sticking with dulwich. Since at least that gives
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote: the
advantage of being pure Python.
I must be missing something. Why not just work through the python subprocess interface? As Dave points out, the git interaction is really simple, so isn't the subprocess approach sufficient?
It's not sufficient.. As I can't rewrite the subrepo references to use the HTTPS protocol instead of the GIT protocol (which is how they are currently encoded) with the git CLI. And I really want to avoid having testers install git, if possible. As it's not an easy install as say svn and hg. -- -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo