On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 19 March 2012 13:13, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Daniel James wrote:
Sorry, we haven't set the schedule yet. Mainly because no one has got round to it. The release branch is open, but check before merging a new library, we need to check that everything's okay.
Boost.Algorithm has been stable on the trunk for several weeks.
It isn't just about test results, see:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/ReleasePractices/ManagerCheckList#NewL...
That page says:
Before a new library is merged into branches/release, the release manager should verify:
• root/libs/libraries.htm entry is OK, both in the alphabetic list and in the category lists.
This is done now. (r77561)
• root/libs/maintainers.txt entry is OK.
This was already done.
• The library's root/libs/xxx directory contains an index.html file with either the main docs or a redirection to the main docs. This is done now (r77564) - it redirects to the generated docs
• The primary docs pages meet Boost requirements and guidelines. Don't leave this until too late; it has turned up lots of issues in the past.
Well, I think that they do - other people may differ. I know there's more work to do here before release - a couple pages are pretty empty (Boyer-Moore-Horspool and Knuth-Morris-Pratt), but I've got the text around, just have to bang it into shape. I also want an index.
• Trunk inspection report is clean. Yes.
• Trunk regression tests are reasonably clean or marked up.
Yes. -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com> A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki