On 8/15/2011 4:59 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
on Sun Aug 14 2011, John Bytheway<jbytheway+boost-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
On 13/08/11 23:32, Edward Diener wrote:
On 8/13/2011 11:43 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
The C++0x standard has been approved by ISO/IEC. The vote was unanimous; all 21 National Bodies voting were in favor.
That means the dozen or so Boost libraries that were in TR1 are now part of the standard itself. Good work, Boosters!
Bravo !
What is the official name of the new C++ standard ? You refer to it as C++0x, which is the name I have been accustomed to hear, but other are now saying C++11.
I think this depends when it gets published. That's very likely to be this year, in which case C++11.
That would be the unofficial name. Bronek had the correct official designation.
I was really asking what informal nomenclature will most likely be used to refer to the new C++ standard. It seems C++11 will probably be the way it will informally be called, and not C++0x as many have gotten used to referring to it while it was still in the process of standardization.