On 10/26/2010 08:00 AM, Jim Bell wrote:
Library authors shouldn't have to bear the burden of bug reports for their libraries alone. Even maintaining their regression tests across all platforms isn't realistic (and isn't being done).
So what if we try to recruit a couple helpers for each library?
I see two avenues where we can use some volunteer help to improve boost's quality.
1. Dandelion pickers: look at failed/yellow regression tests and try to fix them. Volunteers could pick a platform they have access to, and try to work across all libraries. You might be surprised at how easy many are to fix. 2. Ticket triage: pick a library and go through all open tickets. Change severity, resolve, request more information, try to map to an existing regression test, interact with the submitter in the comments. (I think Trac needs a "requesting more information" state.) Even a brief 'triage' on each would be helpful, and help users feel they're being heard. (Trac needs to track this, too.) Write new regressions from legitimate issues.
Recruiting pitch: it's a great way to improve your skills--troubleshooting, C++, platform-specific expertise, communication.
Not so glamorous, but important and great experience. Might be fun.
Patrick