Re: [boost] [review][constrained_value] Review of Constrained Value Library begins today

Zach Laine wrote:

Quite true. But the code above is user-supplied, so the user can write their code so that such collisions do not occur, if they need identical behavior to int in NDEBUG mode, or the library author could change the spelling of value() to be something less likely to cause problems, or both.

Yeah, that would be possible. But you know? I think I'll stick with unconstrained. :-) Sebastian