
19 Aug
2004
19 Aug
'04
3:49 p.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)
Aw, c'mon; it's a trade-off. You gain some self-documenting power, save some typing, eliminate the possibility of certain errors. You lose EBO and add minor coupling. Anything I missed? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com