
7 Nov
2005
7 Nov
'05
6:32 p.m.
God, I hope not. The only reason this component exists is because some people here on the list, who were familiar with original testing library wanted something for backward compatibility. In fact for the new users I don't see almost any reasons to use it at all. Boost.Test provides better alternatives.
Quoting from the introduction to the documentation section for the Minimal Testing facility:
Minimal testing facility does not require linking with external components, so could be a component of choice for simple and quick testing needs.
Perhaps something more akin to your message above should be in this introduction. Note that one of my co-workers also went down this
Ok. I will add some discouraging message. Gennadiy