Hi, I recently posted a patch which fixes some g++ 4.3 compiler errors and warnings but it was mostly ignored. I was forced that's why to create bug reports (which you call ticket, don't know why) for each library (which is time consuming especially without email interface) (#1332 -- #1341). I assumed trivial bugs such as Index: boost/gil/extension/dynamic_image/apply_operation_base.hpp =================================================================== --- boost/gil/extension/dynamic_image/apply_operation_base.hpp (Revision 40416) +++ boost/gil/extension/dynamic_image/apply_operation_base.hpp (Arbeitskopie) @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ // Create specializations of apply_operation_fn for each N 0..100 GIL_GENERATE_APPLY_FWD_OPS(99) -}; +} // unary application template <typename Types, typename Bits, typename Op> which lead to real compile errors (at least using -pedantic) will be fixed during minutes but I was wrong! Of course I know that not everyone can react as fast but why do not commit other people such elementary stuff? Instead many simple patches are rotting in the bug database. Is this useful? Is it enforced somewhere that only the maintainer is allowed to commit patches for his library? I understand of course that not trivial stuff which needs to be analysed cannot be handled this way but there are so many trivial patches just ignored ... Jens