12 Apr
2011
12 Apr
'11
6:25 p.m.
On 12 April 2011 12:55, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:15:56 -0500, Nevin Liber wrote:
Only if it is implemented the way Steven described it. You cannot legally compare pointers using relationship operators (<, <=, >, >=) unless at least one is NULL,
really, in C++ you can do it if one is NULL? What result do you get?
Oops, you can't. The null pointer constant only matters when using equality operators. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404