Message: 6 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:46:32 -0500 From: Rene Rivera <grafik.list@redshift-software.com> Subject: To: Message-ID: <411AF628.80605@redshift-software.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Robert Ramey wrote:
Actually I'm not doing the testing. I'm just relying on the table of test results which refers to compiler "CW" So I don't really know what version it is.
It's 9.2, or possibly 9.3. Stefan should really label the version.
Stefan: if you tell me which version you are running I can add a toolset into CVS for it.
Hmmm so the current set of facts is: Ramey:CWPro 9.2 in debug mode - fails export tests Rivera:CWPro 8.3 in release mode - fails export tests Stephan:CWPro 9.2?3 in ? mode - passes export tests. Its not clear to me how to address this. I would love to know what I'm doing differently than Stephan is. We're using the same tool set - cwpro9 or are we? Shouldn't the heading on the results table correspond to the toolset name? I'm using the toolset labeled cwpro9 - is this the correct one to use? Robert Ramey