
18 Aug
2013
18 Aug
'13
5:53 p.m.
On 18/08/13 18:48, TONGARI J wrote:
I should refer to this:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/08/184468.php
Of course it's for C++11 only...
Yes I've seen this. It's limited in somewhat unexpected ways, requires a lot of C++11 features to be correctly implemented, and also is unnecessarily inefficient at compile-time. I see no compelling advantage to using it instead of less obscure, more flexible, more portable and more efficient solutions.