6 Jun
2005
6 Jun
'05
4:40 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:18:38PM +0100, Paul A Bristow wrote:
| Andy Little wrote: | | > Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However, | > the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have | been approved on a similar limited number of reviews.
I think this low number is because people feel they MUST put quite a lot of work into a review.
Provided reviewers state when they only glanced at the submission, I think that the sum of all these 'quickies' would be helpful, when considered in combination with a few 'in-depth' reviews.
That's good to know, as I might be able to contribute quickies. My time has been severely limited recently. jon