Agree, GitHub is a great tool and it will do nicely for this task. And yes, I understand migrating such a big and distributed project is a very tedious process. Thanks for clarifications and for sharing your opinion. Well, good luck, and hope to see new activity in boost.python soon. ----- Best regards, Mikhail Matrosov 2015-03-26 17:21 GMT+03:00 Stefan Seefeld <stefan@seefeld.name>:
Stefan,
Thank you! Hope you will get back soon!
Would you please explain, what is the right way to say that this
bug is fixed in this particular pull request? When I tried to attach a
On 26/03/15 09:47 AM, Mikhail Matrosov wrote: particular link
to the pull request on GitHub to my comment in trac, it was rejected: cannot post web links.
I honestly don't know. (I suspect the rejection of web links is a deliberate attempt to contain spam.)
For quite a while I have been only observing Boost development, and its slow and seemingly never-ending attempts to migrate to other tools and processes. Personally I would be happy to entirely move to github for boost.python development, including issue tracking, wiki, and website, just for simplicity's sake. But I'm sure there are many people around here with strong and diverging opinions, and I don't want to get sucked into such discussions.
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost