[boost] Re: [indirect container] RFC on naming of library and classes

"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote in message | Boost.Indirect Cotainer was suggested by Joaquin. It sounds reasonable to me. | I don't have any alternatives, but suggestions are welcome. An alternative might be Boost.Clonable Container and the names of the classes could be clonable_vector<T> clonable_map<Key,T> etc. -Thorsten