28 Oct
2009
28 Oct
'09
7:17 p.m.
On Oct 28, 5:51 pm, Ruediger Berlich <ruediger.berl...@iwr.fzk.de> wrote:
JD wrote:
Please have a look and let me know what you think could be improved.
the SF page currently lists loglite as being covered by the LGPL, while some source files I looked at are under the Boost license. Is all of loglite under the Boost license ?
I haven't spend much time thinking about this but the story is, I wrote the library initially for boost and chose the boost license. When I checked in the code on googecode, the boost license was not available in the list. I wonder which one is more permissive. JD