"Walter Landry" <wlandry@ucsd.edu> wrote in message news:20040603.220540.74755357.wlandry@ucsd.edu...
[...] http://www.oonumerics.org/FTensor/ [...]
From what I can see, oonumerics is just a loose collection of libraries without any particular reviewing standards. Is that a fair claim? I don't see why Boost couldn't contact the authors of the libraries featured there and ask them to submit their libraries to Boost. Would that be a sensible thing to do? After all, it looks like those libraries are probably well-developed and thought out by experts in those domains. The benefit of having them in Boost, of course, is the review that ensures high code quality, uniformity, and sharing of redundant facilities. And I don't see that there is any conflict between having them listed on oonumerics.org and also be Boost libraries. Is there?
Dave --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.691 / Virus Database: 452 - Release Date: 5/26/2004