5 Mar
2008
5 Mar
'08
3:09 p.m.
Stathi Triadis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger@isonews2.com> wrote:
I'm writing to gauge interest in an 'abstract factory', very similar to the recently accepted functional/factory. Why not simply use factory/function combination?
typedef boost::function< A*(string, int) > AFactory; typedef boost::factory< B* > BFactory;
That's quite nice... I didn't know you could do that. But this is no good for modularization, correct?
Not that I'm aware of. Why do you think so? Doesn't the OO-style abstract factory you use in fact just encapsulate a function? Regards, Tobias