Eric Niebler wrote:
Shouldn't we provide specializations for both `result_of` and `tr1_result_of` to make result_of and tr1_result_of equivalent?
Yes. Can you file bug reports?
(Additional question: Should we avoid the specialization of result_of when we use decltype-based result_of?)
Probably. More bug reports, please! :-)
Done. [Add tr1_result_of specialization and avoid specialization of decltype-based result_of] * Functional/Forward https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6909 * Fusion https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6910 * Phoenix V3 https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6911 * Phoenix V2 https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6912 [Avoid specialization of decltype-based result_of] * Proto https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6913 [Feature request: Add result_of and tr1_result_of specializations for nullary function calls] * Lambda https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6914 Regards, Michel