5 Oct
2011
5 Oct
'11
10:50 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:37 AM, John Maddock <boost.regex@virgin.net> wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, that model doesn't entirely solve these problems, we'd have a situation where:
* Everyone tests independently against the last release, and everything on it's own looks great. * A change that removes features gets merged to release and.... oops now the release branch is broken.
So we'd need some kind of integration testing as well....
Some projects test an update before that updates gets merged (into trunk or release) with build farms. Can't Boost do the same? Olaf