23 Nov
2008
23 Nov
'08
10:50 p.m.
Dave Handley skrev:
I have looked it up, and its not documented. Period.
Anyway, I'm sorry you feel the way you do. I don't intentionally try to break people's code, and I have put an enourmous effort into the code I've submitted to boost.
FWIW, boost.range is not changing anymore.
Unfortunately, you've already broken my confidence - unless of course, we can come up with a decent compromise on this which seems further away by the hour.
If the compromise does not include going back to the old behavior for boost::iterator_range, then I'm open to suggestions (If we did that, how would we explain that situation to all those that want the current behavior?). -Thorsten